<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://purl.org/atom/ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule" version="0.3">
<title>Comments on 'The greatest of all'</title>
<link type="text/html" rel="alternate" href="http://jhn.blogentis.net/2007/09/30/the-greatest-of-all"/>
<id>http://jhn.blogentis.net/2007/09/30/the-greatest-of-all</id>
<modified>2007-10-01T04:18:27+03:00</modified>
<tagline type="text/html" mode="escaped">Sometimes I have to spend a couple of minutes arguing with ignorants, who believe they're very skilled programmers.</tagline>
<generator version="0.1">Blogentis</generator>
<entry>
<link type="text/html" rel="alternate" href="http://jhn.blogentis.net/2007/09/30/the-greatest-of-all#c113570"/>
<id>http://jhn.blogentis.net/2007/09/30/the-greatest-of-all#c113570</id>
<summary mode="escaped" type="text/html">Haskell. Erlang. Lisp. Hell, even Java is better. Haskell: ridiculously high level language, lazy evaluation. Erlang: ridiculously concurrent. Lisp: The only thing it's good at is writing your own domain-specific languages, and that is a huge time booster. Java even has garbage collection - and your program never crashes.</summary>
<author>
<name>Tassos Bassoukos (http://tassos.blogentis.net)</name>
</author>
<modified>2007-10-01T04:18:27+03:00</modified>
<issued>2007-10-01T04:18:27+03:00</issued>
</entry>
</feed>
